In any case, the preliminary results of the
molecular analysis are in agreement with those of the morphologic
analysis: the mosaic of characteristics exhibited by the chaetognaths
is an indication of the ancestral character of this lineage. The
paleontological evidence also supports this, because fossils dating
back to more than 500 million years have been assigned to this group
(Chen & Huang). Since inclusion in the
Deuterostome group has been excluded, several hypotheses remain
possible, including :
- The chaetognath lineage may have separated very early, before
the Protostome-Deuterostome divergence. These animals would then
be the group of choice for reconstituting the common ancestor of
all the bilaterians (which, of course, does not imply that the
chaetognaths would necessarily resemble this ancestor).
- The chaetognath lineage may have separated after the
divergence of the Protostome branch. It would therefore occupy a
basal position in the Protostome tree, outside of the two large
groups of Lophotrochozoa (Mollusks, Annelids, Brachiopods, etc.)
and the Ecdysozoa (Arthropods, Nematodes, etc.); alternatively
they could be placed within one of these groups.
Last update on 16 January 2008